ILLUSTRATIONS
|
Page
|
|
Figure
|
6
|
2.--Simplified representation of energy in unsteady flow |
6
|
3.--Two-dimensional finite difference analog |
16
|
4.--Diffusion model ( |
24
|
5.--Comparison of outflow hydrographs at 5 and 10 miles |
25
|
|
| |
6.--Comparison of depths of water at 5 and 10 miles |
27
|
|
|
|
7.--Dam-break study location |
32
|
|
|
|
8.--Surveyed cross section locations on owens river |
34
|
|
|
|
9.--Floodplain computed from k-634 model |
35
|
|
|
|
10.--Floodplain discretization for two-dimensional |
37
|
|
|
|
11.--Comparison of modeled water surface elevations |
38
|
|
|
|
12.--Floodplain for two-dimensional diffusion |
39
|
13.--Diffusion hydrodynamic model one-dimensional |
42
|
14.--Grid element nodal molecule |
43
|
15.--Diffusion hydrodynamic interface model |
45
|
16.--Gradually varied flow profiles |
49
|
17.--Cucamonga creek discretization |
51
|
18.--Design storm for cucamonga creek |
52
|
19.--Modeled runoff hydrographs for cucamonga creek |
53
|
20.--Vicinity map for dam-break analyses |
54
|
) and k-634 model results (solid line) for 1,000-feet width channel, manning's n = 0.04, And various channel slopes, 
vi